{"id":1867,"date":"2011-09-27T18:15:24","date_gmt":"2011-09-27T17:15:24","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blog.widmann.org.uk\/?p=1867"},"modified":"2011-09-27T18:15:24","modified_gmt":"2011-09-27T17:15:24","slug":"phonetic-palindromes","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/widmanniana.org\/blog\/phonetic-palindromes\/","title":{"rendered":"Phonetic palindromes"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>In some languages, palindromes are fairly easy to construct.<\/p>\n<p>However, to some extent this is a result of the writing system &ndash; for instance, in English &#8216;hs&#8217; is almost nonexistent, which means that &#8216;sh&#8217; cannot be used in palindromes; if English started using &#8216;\u0161&#8217; instead of &#8216;sh&#8217;, it would immediately allow for more palindromes.<\/p>\n<p>On the other hand, if we look at phonetic palindromes, any such bias created by the writing system should disappear.  By &#8216;phonetic palindrome&#8217;, I mean an utterance that sounds more or less the same if played backwards.<\/p>\n<p>Phonetic palindromes are definitely possible.  In English, for instance &#8220;Say &#8216;Mum, yes!'&#8221; [?s?j ?m?m ?j?s] (writing [?j] instead of the usual [e?]), and in Danish, &#8220;Dannie gik i nat&#8221; \/?d?\u00e6ni ?g?ig? i ?n\u00e6d?\/.<\/p>\n<p>However, I didn&#8217;t find it very easy to construct these, and I wonder whether there are languages that allow you to construct phonetic palindromes of a reasonable length?<\/p>\n<p>I can see some potential issues that will limit the ease of construction in certain languages.  For instance, in Danish and most varieties of English, \/p t k\/ are aspirated, which means that they are phonetically [p? t? k?]; when these are reversed, they result in [hp ht hk], and these sequences do not occur in Danish and English.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In some languages, palindromes are fairly easy to construct. However, to some extent this is a result of the writing system &ndash; for instance, in English &#8216;hs&#8217; is almost nonexistent, which means that &#8216;sh&#8217; cannot be used in palindromes; if English started using &#8216;\u0161&#8217; instead of &#8216;sh&#8217;, it would immediately allow for more palindromes. On the other hand, if we look at phonetic palindromes, any such bias created by the writing system should disappear. By &#8216;phonetic palindrome&#8217;, I mean an utterance that sounds more or less the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[159,117],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1867","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-en","category-linguistics"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/widmanniana.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1867","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/widmanniana.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/widmanniana.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/widmanniana.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/widmanniana.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1867"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/widmanniana.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1867\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/widmanniana.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1867"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/widmanniana.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1867"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/widmanniana.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1867"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}