{"id":6310,"date":"2012-11-28T23:46:08","date_gmt":"2012-11-28T23:46:08","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blog.widmann.org.uk\/?p=6310"},"modified":"2012-11-28T23:46:08","modified_gmt":"2012-11-28T23:46:08","slug":"the-spirit-was-willing-but-the-flesh-was-weak","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/widmanniana.org\/blog\/the-spirit-was-willing-but-the-flesh-was-weak\/","title":{"rendered":"The spirit was willing but the flesh was weak"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"float: right; margin-left: 10px; margin-bottom: 10px;\">\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/bringinudownfromabove\/4322373013\/\" title=\"photo sharing\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/farm5.staticflickr.com\/4017\/4322373013_d697868e3c_m.jpg\" alt=\"\" style=\"border: solid 2px #000000;\" \/><\/a><br \/>\n<span style=\"font-size: 0.9em; margin-top: 0px;\"><br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/bringinudownfromabove\/4322373013\/\">If Jesus was God,<br \/>\nwhy did he pray to himself?<\/a><br \/>\nOriginally uploaded by <a href=\"http:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/bringinudownfromabove\/\">Zombie Inc.<\/a><br \/>\n<\/span>\n<\/div>\n<p>When I was a linguistics fresher back in 1990, we were told a well-known anecdote about the early days of machine translation: When the sentence &#8220;The spirit is willing, but the flesh is weak&#8221; (an allusion to Mark 14:38) was translated into Russian and then back to English, the result was &#8220;The vodka is good, but the meat is rotten&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>I vaguely remember trying out this sentence in the early days of <a href=\"http:\/\/translate.google.com\/\">Google Translate<\/a>, with amusing result.<\/p>\n<p>However, I recently decided to try it again, and imagine my surprise when I realised that Google Translate can translate this exact phrase into any of the available languages and back into English without making a single error.<\/p>\n<p>The obvious explanation is that Google must have added Mark 14:38 to the training corpus to ensure that nobody mocks them for getting it wrong.<\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s only this specific sentence that it handles this well.  As soon as you start moving the words around or adding extra words, the quality of the translation decreases. For instance, &#8220;The spirit is willing, but the flesh is weak&#8221; becomes &#8220;\u00c5nden er rede, men k\u00f8det er skr\u00f8beligt&#8221; when translated into Danish, but &#8220;The spirit in the bottle is willing, but the flesh in the box is weak&#8221; becomes &#8220;\u00c5nden i flasken er villig, men k\u00f8det i boksen er svag&#8221;.  I&#8217;m not saying this translation is bad, but I find it interesting how it suddenly becomes unable to add the neuter -t to <i>svag<\/i>, although it managed perfectly well to add it to <i>skr\u00f8belig<\/i>.<\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s quite interesting to investigate how Google Translate handles the individual words in this sentence.  For instance, in the case of translating &#8220;spirit&#8221;, it appears the singular normally triggers the <i>soul<\/i> sense, whereas the plural triggers the <i>alcohol<\/i> sense.  The result is that &#8220;The house of the spirits&#8221; gets translated into Danish as &#8220;Huset af spiritus&#8221; (&#8220;The house of alcohol&#8221;) rather than the expected &#8220;\u00c5ndernes hus&#8221;.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>If Jesus was God, why did he pray to himself? Originally uploaded by Zombie Inc. When I was a linguistics fresher back in 1990, we were told a well-known anecdote about the early days of machine translation: When the sentence &#8220;The spirit is willing, but the flesh is weak&#8221; (an allusion to Mark 14:38) was translated into Russian and then back to English, the result was &#8220;The vodka is good, but the meat is rotten&#8221;. I vaguely remember trying out this sentence in the early days of [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[159,114,117],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6310","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-en","category-computing","category-linguistics"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/widmanniana.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6310","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/widmanniana.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/widmanniana.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/widmanniana.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/widmanniana.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6310"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/widmanniana.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6310\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/widmanniana.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6310"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/widmanniana.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6310"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/widmanniana.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6310"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}